Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Hedeen International LLC v. Zing Toys Inc et al
as 1:2014cv00304
Plaintiff:
Hedeen International LLC
Defendant:
Zing Toys Inc, OzWest Inc and Peter Cummings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Xing v. Holder
as 12-2008
Petitioner:
Juan Lin Xing, AKA Juan Lin Zing, AKA Xing Juan Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Zing Brothers v. Bevstar
as 2:2011cv00337
Plaintiff:
Zing Brothers
Defendant:
Bevstar
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Zing Brothers v. Margaritaville et al
as 2:2011cv00303
Plaintiff:
Zing Brothers
Defendant:
Harcos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Promote Innovation LLC v. Ozwest, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Promote Innovation LLC
Defendant:
Ozwest, Inc. and Zing Toys, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zing Toys, Inc. v. Zuru, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00863
Defendant:
Anna Jane Mowbray, Matthew Peter Mowbray, Nicholas James Mowbray and others
Plaintiff:
Zing Toys, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
NRRM, LLC v. Access Warranty et al
as 4:2010cv00427
Plaintiff:
NRRM, LLC
Defendant:
Access Warranty, Zing Auto Coverage, Interstate National Dealer Services and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Tower Insurance Company of New York v. Zing Lu, LLC
as 4:2009cv01713
Plaintiff:
Tower Insurance Company of New York, Tower Insurance Company of New York and Tower Insurance Company of New York
Defendant:
Zing Lu, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
ZING TOYS, INC. v. THINK LINK, INC
as 2:2008cv05796
Plaintiff:
ZING TOYS, INC.
Defendant:
THINK LINK, INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Toy Investments Inc v. Ozwest Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00646
Plaintiff:
Toy Investments Inc
Defendant:
Ozwest Inc, Ozwest Inc, Peter Cummings and others
Counter Claimant:
Zing Toys Inc, Ozwest Inc, Ozwest Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Toy Investments Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
