Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Owen et al v. Lindley et al
as 2:2013at01056
Plaintiff:
Darrin Owen, James Joyce, Olen Daugherty and others
Defendant:
Stephen Lindley and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Joyce v. Armstrong Teasdale
as 12-3572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Joyce
Defendant - Appellee:
Armstrong Teasdale, LLP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Charles Jackson v. City of PGH, et al
as 10-3802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PGH, TIMOTHY KREGER, individually and as agent of the City of Pittsburgh, PA, ERIC HOLMES, individually and as agent of the City of Pittsburgh, PA and others
James Joyce v. Armstrong Teasdale
as 10-1362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Joyce
Defendant - Appellee:
Armstrong Teasdale, LLP
Carol Shloss v. Sean Sweeney, et al
as 09-16397
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAROL LOEB SHLOSS
Defendant - Appellant:
SEAN SWEENEY, in his capacity as trustee of the Estate of James Joyce and THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE
Vincent Marino v. John Mook, et al
as 09-1612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT MARINO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MOOK, City of Pittsburgh Detective, Defendant #D3510 and JAMES JOYCE, City of Pittsburgh Detective, Defendant ID #G 3425
Fridriksson et al v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00053
Plaintiff:
Joan Fridriksson, Joan Fridriksson, Joan Fridriksson and others
Defendant:
Lucent Technologies, Inc., Lucent Technologies, Inc., Lucent Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joyce v. Sharrow and Associates et al
as 2:2008cv13969
Plaintiff:
James Joyce
Defendant:
Sharrow and Associates, Sharrow Group, LLC, William Carpitella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Joyce v. Armstrong Teasdale, LLP
as 4:2008cv01390
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOYCE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG TEASDALE, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
