Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Hunter v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02126
Petitioner:
Steven Hunter
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Denise Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Internal Revenue Service
as 5:2022ct03241
Plaintiff:
Steven Hunter
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Scarantino
as 5:2021hc02221
Petitioner:
Steven Hunter
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Steven Hunter v. Felipie Martinez, Jr. et al
as 2:2020cv11289
Defendant:
Dr. Espero, Dr. Dorsey, Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Hunter v. USA
as 20-56201
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN HUNTER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Steven Hunter v. USDC-CALA
as 20-73117
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Not Classified By Court:
FELIPE MARTINEZ, Jr. and In re: STEVEN HUNTER
Petitioner:
STEVEN HUNTER
Steven Hunter v. Felipe Martinez Jr
as 2:2020cv08317
Petitioner:
Steven Hunter
Respondent:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Steven Hunter v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv08136
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Steven Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gaines v. County of Wayne et al
as 2:2020cv11186
Defendant:
Sergeant Leonard Davis, Wellpath LLC, f/k/a Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Shanique Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2020cv02416
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HUNTER and THE ESTATE OF CINDY HUNTER
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
