Cases 11 - 20 of 769
Mayes v. Province
as 23-6161
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAWRENCE L. MAYES
Respondent / Appellee:
GREG PROVINCE, Warden
SLAYTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28541
Plaintiff:
GIDEON SLAYTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DANIELS et al v. MARLEIHIA HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv03867
Plaintiff:
DANEE SLAYTON, KELVIN DANIELS, UMIR IDRIS and others
Defendant:
MARLEIHIA HARPER, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICE, NICOLE MACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. One (1) Smith & Wesson M&P, 45 Pistol, CAL:45 SN:DXV1150 et al
as 2:2023cv02565
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One (1) Smith & Wesson M&P, 45 Pistol, CAL:45 SN:DXV1150, One (1) Glock GMBH 22 Pistol, CAL:40 SN:TGS716 and One (1) Ruger Ruger-57 Pistol, CAL:57 SN:643-04159
Claimant:
Stephen Sanders and Rebecca Slayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Slayton et al v. Menards
as 3:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Slayton and Ronald Slayton, Jr.
Defendant:
Menard, Inc. d/b/a Menards and Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
ALICEA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv23610
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL ALICEA, LEROY AHNEE, RICHARD CABBIL and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Slayton v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03114
Petitioner:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alicea et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
Israel Alicea, Leroy Ahnee, Richard Cabbil and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Lockett v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Tyree Lockett and Ty
Defendant:
Robert May, Shafer, Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
