Cases 241 - 250 of 524
Adams et al v. Morrissey et al
as 1:2017cv11059
Plaintiff:
Brianna J. Adams, Patricia U. Adams, Blenda A. Rice and others
Defendant:
Michael W. Morrissey, Edward J Doherty, Michael Kasprzak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv03330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Adams
as 17-1812
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Shawn J. Adams
Mathews v. Hayden et al
as 3:2017cv00627
Plaintiff:
Carlton Xavier Mathews
Defendant:
Sergeant Hayden, Officer J. Adams, Officer Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91165
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Paul J. Adams
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
Mathews v. Hayden et al
as 3:2017cv00433
Plaintiff:
Carlton Xavier Mathews
Defendant:
Hayden, J. Adams, Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MINNIS v. FINK et al
as 4:2017cv00168
Plaintiff:
BOBBY MINNIS
Defendant:
A L FINK, OSBORNE, DELOACHE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashton et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2017cv02003
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Ashton , John Ashton , Mary Buckley and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Bartter et al
as 5:2017cv00239
Defendant:
Bartter, Dominion Resources, Inc., NiSource Corporate Services Company and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Kanzigg et al
as 2:2017cv00105
Counter Defendant:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Kanzigg, Ricki Frederica Fulton, Michael J. Kirk (Remainderman) and others
Counter Claimant:
North American Coal Royalty Company, Paul E. Holiday, Jr., Capstone Holding Company and others
Interested Party:
Tom Horner, Gerald Frank Hinkle, Craig Paynter and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
