Cases 241 - 250 of 884
USA v. John Kane
as 22-1019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN ALLEN KANE
Security Limits Inc., v. Avangrid Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10124
Defendant:
Prosegur Security Monitoring, Inc., Avangrid Networks, Inc., Avangrid, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Security Limits Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
John Allen, et al v. Jeffrey McClain
as 21-4113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ALLEN, ROGER JOHNSON, RONALD A. CHOINA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY A. MCCLAIN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Ohio Dept. of Taxation
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02599
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALLEN SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02331
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALLEN ANDERSON, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Allen v. Jefferson County Jail
as 3:2021cv00654
Plaintiff:
John Allen
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Jefferson County Jail
as 3:2021cv02633
Plaintiff:
John Allen
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goggin v. Blythe Construction Inc et al
as 7:2021cv03157
Plaintiff:
Thomas Goggin
Defendant:
Blythe Construction Inc, Zachry Construction Corp, Johnson Mirmiran and Thompson Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goggin v. Blythe Construction Inc et al
as 7:2021cv03158
Plaintiff:
Thomas Goggin
Defendant:
Blythe Construction Inc, Zachry Construction Corp, Johnson Mirmiran and Thompson Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
