Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Hecking v. NH Conjunctive Parties, et al
as 14-1032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIRCK HECKING
Defendant - Appellee:
NH CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES, KELLY AYOTTE, KATHERINE J. BARGER and others
Wagoner v. Dircks
as 3:2013cv01135
Plaintiff:
Linda S Wagoner
Defendant:
Louise M Dircks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hecking v. NH Coalition for Occupational Safety and Health, Director
as 1:2013cv00366
Plaintiff:
Dirck Hecking
Defendant:
NH Coalition for Occupational Safety and Health, Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
DIRCKS v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv04664
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DIRCKS
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hecking v. New Hampshire Conjunctive Parties, et al
as 1:2013cv00338
Defendant:
Kelly Ayotte, Katherine Barger, Tim Beaupre and others
Plaintiff:
Dirck Hecking
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Dircks
as 3:2013cv00643
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David C Dircks
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853 Forfeiture Property - Firearms
HECKING v. NEW HAMPSHIRE CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES et al
as 1:2013cv00565
Defendant:
ATTY. MS. "PAT", MS. KELLY AYOTTE, MS. KATHRYN BARGER and others
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN DIRCK HECKING
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HECKING v. NHCOSH
as 1:2012cv01551
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN DIRCK HECKING
Defendant:
NHCOSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Museum Associates, Ltd. et al v. Midzor et al
as 2:2010cv01042
Plaintiff:
Museum Associates, Ltd. and Richard Berger
Defendant:
GM Property Development, LLC , Tina Choate , Brian Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIKER v. CMS INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01752
Plaintiff:
HASSAN RIKER
Defendant:
CMS INC., NJ DOC / CTP, JOHN DOE PAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
