Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Dols v. Berryhill
as 0:2016cv03815
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Dols
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Strujan et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2016cv05418
Defendant:
Zaza Aivazi, Appellate Division, Third Department, Paul Basuk and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Strujan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BHATT v. COMMISSIONER OF NJ DOL et al
as 3:2016cv05654
Plaintiff:
CHAULA S. BHATT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF NJ DOL, DIVISION DIRECTOR OF NJ DOL and MIDDLESEX COUNTY SOCIAL WELFARE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00628
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mohammad v. United States, et al
as 16-2078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHALID MOHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Broughton v. MSPB, et al
as 16-1089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARLENE M. BROUGHTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, OPM, DOL-14 SEA WORKER'S COMPENSATION, DOL-12 DEN WORKER'S COMPENSATION and others
Park v. XYZ Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv07437
Defendant:
John Does, Jane Does #1-10, Hye Won Oh and others
Plaintiff:
Young Dol Park
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Broughton v. Merit System Protection Board et al
as 1:2015cv02816
Plaintiff:
Darlene M. Broughton
Defendant:
Merit System Protection Board, DOL - 14 Sea Worker's Compensation, DOL - 12 Den Worker's Compensation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Williams v. NYS Department of Labor (DOL) 12212
as 1:2015cv09681
Plaintiff:
Shavar Williams
Defendant:
NYS Department of Labor (DOL) 12212
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santos v. US DOL OSHA
as 1:2015cv09025
Plaintiff:
Daniel Santos
Defendant:
US DOL OSHA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
