Cases 21 - 30 of 774
Wilson v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Brian K Wilson
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARANA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25462
Plaintiff:
SANTOS ARANA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Calvin L. El Bey Sharp v. Jeff Lynch et al.
as 2:2023cv08317
Petitioner:
Calvin L. El Bey Sharp
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch, Altom, Axelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Thomas et al
as 8:2023cv01952
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Major R. Thomas, R. Thomas, R. Juisti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arana v. Jodel et al
as 3:2023cv04206
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arana
Defendant:
Joseph Jodel and AGY Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gonzalez-Mendez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1731
Petitioner:
NORMA ADALI GONZALEZ-MENDEZ and KARLA FERNANDA ARANA-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lockhart v. Dacquel et al
as 6:2023cv06438
Defendant:
Jamie Elizabeth Mallo Dacquel, Patrick Daniel Aranas Dacquel, James Elizabeth Dacquel and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lockhart
Miller v. Keast et al
as 3:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Micheal Miller
Defendant:
John Keast, Halki, Jessica Rambur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Arana-Hernandez
as 23-2083
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BYRON ESTUARDO ARANA-HERNANDEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
