Cases 21 - 30 of 993
Robert Crenshaw v. Staton Healthcare Service, et al
as 24-10250
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES CRENSHAW
Defendant:
STATON HEALTHCARE SERVICE and ELLIS
M.K. v. Pearl River Cty Sch Dist
as 24-60035
Plaintiff:
M.K., a minor by and through his father and next friend, Greg Koepp
Defendant:
Pearl River County School District, P.B., a minor by and through his parents, P.A., a minor by and through his parents and others
Crenshaw v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03007
Plaintiff:
Michael Crenshaw
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, . Holzer, . Edger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Toulon et al
as 2:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Kevin Crenshaw
Defendant:
Errol Toulon, Jane Doe and Jon Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Ronald Crenshaw
as 24-3012
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD CRENSHAW
Crenshaw v. Doll et al
as 3:2024cv50012
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Crenshaw
Defendant:
David A. Doll, J. Hanley, Michele Grimaldi-Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toppin et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09584
Plaintiff:
Henisha Toppin, Shjayia Jones and J.T.
Defendant:
City of New York, Marisa Louis-Jean, Brandon Agosto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Edward Crenshaw v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06964
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Devin Crenshaw
as 23-4036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEVIN CRENSHAW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
