Cases 1 - 10 of 992
Crenshaw v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Carleen Crenshaw
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Crenshaw v. Brittany Greene
as 24-1724
Applicant:
MICHAEL P. CRENSHAW
Respondent:
BRITTANY GREENE, Warden
Consensys Software Inc. v. Gensler et al
as 4:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Consensys Software Inc.
Defendant:
Gary Gensler, Caroline A. Crenshaw, Jaime E. Lizarraga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Valentine v. Compass Minerals International, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02165
Plaintiff:
John Valentine
Defendant:
Compass Minerals International, Inc., Kevin S. Crutchfield, Edward C. Dowling, Jr. and others
Crenshaw v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01825
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Crenshaw
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crenshaw v. Minard et al
as 2:2024cv10955
Plaintiff:
DeMario Reed Crenshaw
Defendant:
Minard and Chris Swanson
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Crenshaw et al
as 3:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee for Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2005-HE2, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-HE2
Defendant:
Quincy Crenshaw and Leah Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Crenshaw v. Anderson et al
as 3:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Tomyia Crenshaw
Defendant:
Leonard Anderson, Darrien Robertson and City of Dallas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crenshaw v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Darryl Crenshaw
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Yesu, Zuckerbraun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Crenshaw v. Staton Healthcare Service, et al
as 24-10859
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES CRENSHAW
Defendant:
STATON HEALTHCARE SERVICE and ELLIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
