Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Mary Coltrane v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 14-31102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY L. COLTRANE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, In his personal and individual capacities, GERARDO MALDONADO, JR., In his personal and individual capacities, JOE KEFFER, In his personal and individual capacities and others
Ronald Hill v. Kathleen Maples, et al
as 13-3740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald L. Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Maples, Physicians Assistant, FCI - Forrest City, Andres Molina Ossers, Dr., FCI - Forrest City, Amy Barker, RN, FCI - Forrest City and others
Molina-Roja v. USA
as 8:2013cv02933
Plaintiff:
Paulo Andres Molina-Roja
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Molina-Molina v. USA
as 8:2013cv01218
Plaintiff:
Jorge Andres Molina-Molina
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Charles Card v. Joe Keffer, et al
as 13-30187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES CARD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE KEFFER, JOEL ALEXANDRE, ANDRES MOLINA OSSERS and others
Canty v. Ivanhoff et al
as 1:2012cv02760
Plaintiff:
Anthony Canty
Defendant:
D Ivanhoff, R Zito, Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coltrane v. Lappin et al
as 1:2012cv02231
Plaintiff:
Mary L Coltrane
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin , Gerardo Maldonado, Jr , Joe Keffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Maples et al
as 2:2012cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Hill
Defendant:
K Maples, Andre Molina, G Tolliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Maples et al
as 2:2012cv00145
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Hill
Defendant:
K Maples, Andre Molina, A Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canales et al v. DeMarco
as 2:2011cv05177
Plaintiff:
Juan Cajamarca, Marun Canales, Reynaldo De Jesus and others
Defendant:
Vincent F. DeMarco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
