Cases 21 - 30 of 180,343
Medrano Saenz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3200
Petitioner:
YENY ARELY MEDRANO SAENZ and ZACHARY JOSHUA ARGUETA MEDRANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez-Sierra v. Garland
as 24-60241
Petitioner:
Rene Alejandro Lopez-Sierra
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
Miller v. U.S. Postal Inspection Service
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
PARIS M. MILLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE, DAMIAN WILLIAMS and U.S. ATTORNEY OF NYS SOUTHERN DISTRICT
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Sebastian Nowak v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1877
Petitioner:
SEBASTIAN NOWAK
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
In re: Rodrick Brayboy
as 24-1924
Petitioner:
In re: RODRICK BRAYBOY
Respondent:
MAHANOY SCI, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and others
David Babb v. David Isom
as 24-1456
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY BABB
Defendant:
DAVID ISOM, General Manager for Safe Harbor, RUDY SOCHA, CEO, Wounded Nature Working Veterans, JOHN J. TECKLENBURG, Retired and others
Piper v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Petitioner:
Robert James Piper
Respondent:
Warden Scott Ceresini, The State of Delaware and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirgizbaeva v. Riddle et al
as 1:2024cv04142
Plaintiff:
Asel Kirgizbaeva
Defendant:
Director Kevin Riddle, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
