Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Barno v. Eagleton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2014cv01646
Petitioner: Reginald Barno
Respondent: Willie L Eagleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2013cv03471
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rodney Barno v. Ralph Diaz
as 13-73088
Petitioner: RODNEY BERNARD BARNO
Respondent: RALPH M. DIAZ
BARNO v. CFCF et al
as 2:2013cv04821
Plaintiff: DARRYL BARNO
Defendant: CFCF and HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barno v. Diaz We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01772
Petitioner: Rodney Bernard Barno
Respondent: Ralph Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01035
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Barno v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff: Patricia Barno
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Barno v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00899
Plaintiff: Patricia Barno
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Pecial_master: Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Rodney Bernard Barno v. A De Leon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv01822
Plaintiff: Rodney Bernard Barno
Defendant: A De Leon
Rodney Barno v. George Neotti We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-56725
Petitioner - Appellant: RODNEY BERNARD BARNO
Respondent - Appellee: GEORGE A. NEOTTI, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?