Cases 21 - 30 of 266
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Walker v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
Linda Walker
Defendant:
Belk, Inc., Belk Stores of Mississippi, LLC and John and Jane Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Savvier Fitness LLC v. Southern Telecom, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03086
Plaintiff:
Savvier Fitness LLC
Defendant:
Southern Telecom, Inc., DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC., a California corporation, MACY'S, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Sundaram v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03258
Plaintiff:
Durgamritha Sundaram and Durgamritha T. Sundaram
Defendant:
Belk, Inc., Belk Ecommerce LLC and Sycamore Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lowe v. Belk Department Stores, LP et al
as 1:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Mary Lowe
Defendant:
Belk Department Stores, LP Individually doing business as Belk, Inc., Belk Stores of Mississippi, LLC Individually doing business as Belk, Inc. and Belk, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Advanced Transactions, LLC v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Advanced Transactions, LLC
Defendant:
Belk, Inc. and Belk eCommerce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Belk, Inc. v. SE Aiken, LLC
as 1:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Belk, Inc.
Defendant:
SE Aiken, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Holland v. Belk Inc
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ella A Holland
Defendant:
Belk Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Elsea v. Belk Inc
as 2:2021cv01579
Plaintiff:
Karen Elsea
Defendant:
Belk Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morgan et al v. Belk, Inc. (DE)
as 1:2021cv03590
Plaintiff:
George Wesley Morgan and Peggy Kathryne Morgan
Defendant:
Belk, Inc. (DE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
