Cases 21 - 30 of 12,324
Robinson et al v. Southern Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Brittney Robinson, M.L.R., A.L.R. and others
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Inc., ARPN Karen Bennett-Baker, Adair County, Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Rojas v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05281
Petitioner:
Francisco Salgado Rojas
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03552
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Maxey v. Sivels et al
as 1:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Maxey, Jr.
Defendant:
Chap Sivels, Carpenter, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dees v. Zurlo
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LYNN DEES and ETHAN DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
JILLIAN KNOX, SAMUAL MAXWELL, EMILY WILLIAMS and others
James S. Bennett v. San Bernardino County et al
as 5:2024cv01220
Plaintiff:
James S Bennett
Defendant:
San Bernardino County, Ramon Martinez and Jannessa Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05459
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05432
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Woodward v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05442
Petitioner:
Robert Lucas Woodward
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
