Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Swanson v. Raffensperger We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff: Brian D. Swanson
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Grant et al v. Raffensperger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff: Annie Lois Grant, Quentin T. Howell, Elroy Tolbert and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Sara Tindall Ghazal, Anh Le and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301 Denial or abridgement of right to vote on account of race or color
Common Cause et al v. Raffensperger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff: Common Cause, League of Women Voters of Georgia, Dr. Ursula Thomas and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, John Kennedy and Bonnie Rich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. et al v. Raffensperger We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv05337
Plaintiff: Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc., Sixth District of the African Methodist Episcopal Church, Eric T. Woods and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301 Denial or abridgement of right to vote on account of race or color
Pendergrass et al v. Raffensperger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv05339
Plaintiff: Coakley Pendergrass, Triana Arnold James, Elliott Hennington and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca N. Sullivan, Sara Tindall Ghazal and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301 Denial or abridgement of right to vote on account of race or color
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP et al v. State of Georgia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv05338
Plaintiff: Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Georgia Coalition for the Peoples Agenda, Inc. and Galeo Latino Community Development Fund, Inc.
Defendant: State of Georgia, Brian Kemp and Brad Raffensperger
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301 Denial or abridgement of right to vote on account of race or color
O'Rourke, et al v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1442
Plaintiff: KEVIN O'ROURKE, NATHANIEL L. CARTER, LORI CUTUNILLI and others
Defendant / Appellee: DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE and others
Defendant: MARK E. ZUCKERBERG, individually, PRISCILLA CHAN, individually, BRIAN KEMP, individually and others
Appellant: GARY D. FIELDER and ERNEST J. WALKER
IN RE GEORGIA SENATE BILL 202
as 1:2021mi55555
Plaintiff: The New Georgia Project, Black Voters Matter Fund, Rise, Inc. and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan, David Worley and others
Intervenor Defendant: National Republican Congressional Committee and Republican National Committee
Amicus Curiae: Amicus Curiae, American Center for Law and Justice, Foundation for Government Accountability and others
Petitioner: District of Columbia, Public Interest Legal Foundation, Senator Max Burns and others
Not Classified By Court: Clerk of the Superio Debra DeBerry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STATE OF GEORGIA et al v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv03138
Plaintiff: STATE OF GEORGIA and BRAD RAFFENSPERGER
Defendant: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
O'Rourke, et al v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al
as 21-1394
Plaintiff: KEVIN O'ROURKE, NATHANIEL L. CARTER, LORI CUTUNILLI and others
Defendant / Appellee: DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE and others
Defendant: MARK E. ZUCKERBERG, individually, PRISCILLA CHAN, individually, BRIAN KEMP, individually and others
Appellant: GARY D. FIELDER and ERNEST J. WALKER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?