Cases 21 - 30 of 110
Stephens v. Felsch et al
as 3:2020cv00729
Plaintiff:
Anna C. Stephens
Defendant:
Kora Felsch and Walter Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEPHENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv95942
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN C STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephens v. Steel et al
as 1:2020cv02871
Defendant:
Shane Doe, Waukegan Steel and Wesley Love
Plaintiff:
Dewaun C Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Richard Stephens v. Chad Kenney, et al
as 19-2136
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER H. MADDALONI, CHAD F. KENNEY, PETER G. MYLONAS, Esq. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD C STEPHENS, Son, Henry & Dessie Stephens, Deceased and RICHARD C. STEPHENS, Son, Henry & Dessie Stephens, Deceased
GRIFFIN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv00882
Defendant:
P. TALBOT, R. CARTER, J. ERNEST and others
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. RINEHART et al
as 1:2019cv00615
Defendant:
WALKER, COUNSELLOR, ERNEST and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2019cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey C. Stephens
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Mahally et al
as 1:2019cv00047
Petitioner:
Jeffrey C. Stephens
Respondent:
Leo Dunn, PA Attorney General and Lawerence Mahally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephens v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2018cv06656
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C Stephens and Kenneth C. Stephens
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
