Cases 21 - 30 of 699
Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 3:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Chantelle Williams
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Clark-Fortunat v. Republic National Distributing Company, LLC
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Chantel Clark-Fortunat
Defendant:
Republic National Distributing Company, LLC
Harris v. Jewell
as 2:2024cv00141
Petitioner:
Steven Lamar Harris
Respondent:
Chantell Jewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Duran (PS) v. Contiguglin et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Joseph Louis Duran
Respondent:
Chantel Contiguglin, Shin Young, Assistant District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Southern Haulers Co., LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
Chantelle Hawkins
Defendant:
Southern Haulers Co., LLC, Southern Haulers, LLC, American Bulk Commodities, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mitchell v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 24-292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHANTEL MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
Tate Prows v. City of Oxford, OH, et al
as 23-3920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TATE DAVID PROWS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OXFORD, OH, CHIEF JOHN A. JONES, MICHAEL SMITH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Palakiko v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Carolann Hiaa Palakiko
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Oahu Correctional Community Center, State of Hawaii District Court (Waianae Division) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
