Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Newton v. USA
as 1:2014cv00530
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Newton v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv00776
Plaintiff:
Charles Newton
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton v. USA
as 1:2012cv00915
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Newton et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02289
Plaintiff:
Charles Newton and Betty Jo Newton
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Augerson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01434
Plaintiff:
Calvin Augerson , Victoria Augerson , Beverly Baldwin and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Augerson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01408
Plaintiff:
Calvin Augerson , Victoria Augerson , Beverly Baldwin and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEWTON et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2010cv64134
Plaintiff:
CHARLES NEWTON and DIXIE NEWTON
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEWTON et al v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv85180
Plaintiff:
CHARLES NEWTON, CHARLES NEWTON, DIXIE NEWTON and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, CONGOLEUM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
