Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Wilson et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 0:2014cv00687
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation, Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Wilson and Kathleen Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clay v. Thompson et al(MAG+)
as 2:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
Clarence Clay
Defendant:
Myron H. Thompson , Louis V. Franklin , Terry F. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuyler v. Ley et al
as 1:2012cv03066
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Cuyler
Defendant:
John Ley , Adalberto Jordan , Charles R. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Windsor v. Huber et al
as 1:2011cv02326
Plaintiff:
William M. Windsor
Defendant:
Christopher Huber , Sally Quillian Yates, William S. Duffey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
St Tammany Parish v. Omni Pinnacle, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01472
Plaintiff:
St Tammany Parish
Defendant:
Omni Pinnacle, LLC, Shaw Environmental, Inc, Aaron Marsh and others
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Windsor v. Thrash et al
as 1:2011cv02027
Defendant:
Thomas Woodrow Thrash , Christopher Huber , William S. Duffey and others
Plaintiff:
William M. Windsor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rolle v. Sherrill et al
as 3:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
William C. Sherrill, Jr., Allan Kornblum, Maurice M. Paul and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rolle v. Anderson et al
as 3:2008cv00630
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
R. Lanier Anderson, III, Rosemary Barkett, Phyllis A. Kravitch and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Charles Wilson
as 08-1564
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES R. WILSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
