Cases 21 - 30 of 117
Pledger v. Lynch et al
as 2:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo M. Pledger
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles Samuels, Jr., J.F. Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanchez v. Hunter et al
as 1:2016cv01245
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
Donald Hunter, Wade Bartlett, Lorita Dodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pledger v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016ct03253
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo M. Pledger
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles Samuels, Jr., J.F. Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Stine v. Samuels et al
as 1:2016cv02050
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr. and Blake Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staples v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Charles Samuel, Jr, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv03136
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuel, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lytle v. Samuels et al
as 5:2016cv02277
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Lytle
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Christopher Zych, Curtis Mabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv12367
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuel, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Lytle v. Samuels et al
as 5:2016cv01784
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Lytle
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Christopher Zych, Curtis Mabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016ct03086
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Logan
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuel, Jr., Warden Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
