Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Stevens v. Unknown
as 2:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Chris Stevens
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fink v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2022cv00011
Petitioner:
Chris Steven Fink
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fink v. State of Montana
as 1:2021cv00107
Petitioner:
Chris Steven Fink
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fink v. MT State Parole Board Employees
as 6:2021cv00077
Plaintiff:
Chris Steven Fink
Defendant:
MT State Parole Board Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Paulk et al
as 5:2021cv00058
Plaintiff:
Edward Carter
Defendant:
Daniel Paulk, Scott Harper, Chris Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fink v. State of Montana
as 1:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Chris Steven Fink
Defendant:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald Gwen v. Scott Masher, et al
as 21-15921
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL R. BLUFF, Hon., in his official capacity, CHAD SHILLING, in his official capacity, HEATHER JOHNSON, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD VAUGHN GWEN
Gerald Gwen v. Scott Masher, et al
as 20-17514
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL R. BLUFF, Hon., in his official capacity, CHAD SHILLING, in his official capacity, HEATHER JOHNSON, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD VAUGHN GWEN
Gwen v. Masher et al
as 3:2020cv08225
Defendant:
Scott Masher, Chad Shilling, Arizona, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Vaughn Gwen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARDLOW et al v. PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2019cv05278
Plaintiff:
JAMIE COLEMAN, MEGAN MUSSER, MEGAN HOLLAND and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ELISABETH DEVOS and PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
