Cases 21 - 30 of 126
Cropper v. Palmer et al
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Cropper
Defendant:
Judge Emory Palmer, Herb Cranford, Jr. and Azadeh Golshan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. City of Minden et al
as 5:2022cv01181
Plaintiff:
Robby Dale Bailey
Defendant:
City of Minden, Terry Gardner, Steve Cropper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sarvestaney v. Catholic Health Association of the United States et al
as 4:2022cv04064
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Sarvestaney
Defendant:
Catholic Health Association of the United States, Thomas Waterman, Douglas Cropper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cropper v. Palmer et al
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Cropper
Defendant:
Judge Emory Palmer, Herb Cranford, Jr., Azi Golshan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
James v. City of Minden et al
as 5:2021cv03484
Plaintiff:
Cody James
Defendant:
City of Minden, Steve Cropper, Seth Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Jarrid Cropper
as 21-7371
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JARRID DELMONT CROPPER
Cropper v. Florida Anesthesia Medical Services, P.A. et al
as 8:2021cv02161
Plaintiff:
Frederick Cropper
Defendant:
FLORIDA ANESTHESIA MEDICAL SERVICES 1, P.A. and Team Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
CROPPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49761
Plaintiff:
DONTEY CROPPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
