Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Decker v. Werholtz
as 5:2009cv03252
Petitioner:
Charles D. Decker
Respondent:
Roger Werholtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TIB - The Independent Bankersbank v. Dow Industries et al
as 3:2009cv01458
Plaintiff:
TIB - The Independent Bankersbank and TIB - The Independent Bankersbank
Defendant:
Dow Industries, Michael D. Decker and William D. Decker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Financial Federal Credit Inc. v. Dow Industries et al
as 4:2009cv02414
Plaintiff:
Financial Federal Credit Inc.
Defendant:
Dow Industries, International Screening, LLC, William D. Decker and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lancaster v. Pung et al
as 3:2009cv03230
Plaintiff:
David Gene Lancaster
Defendant:
Pung, Z. Ahmed, G. Kallisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. Ahart et al
as 6:2008cv06290
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Roberts and Kenneth D Roberts
Defendant:
Daniel Ahart, Stephen Dokey, Brandon D. Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
United States of America v. Decker et al
as 4:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Don W. Decker and Julie D. Decker
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Washington v. Grace et al
as 4:2008cv01283
Plaintiff:
Henry Unseld Washington
Defendant:
James L. Grace, David J. Wakefield, R. M. Lawler and others
Amicu:
G C Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DONALDSON v. BRENT D DECKER PHD PA et al
as 5:2008cv00198
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY L DONALDSON
Defendant:
BRENT D DECKER PHD PA and BRENT D DECKER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bermudez v. Rossi et al
as 9:2007cv00367
Plaintiff:
Isaias Bermudez
Defendant:
S. Rossi, R. Montgomery, D. Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
