Cases 1 - 10 of 29
West v. Eastpointe, City of et al
as 2:2023cv12757
Plaintiff:
Andre Dewight West
Defendant:
Eastpointe, City of, D. Decker, Alaa Hussein and others
D.D.D., et al v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 2:2023at01010
Plaintiff:
Damico D. Decker and Alexia Caro
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Nice-Pak Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith et al v. Decker et al
as 4:2022cv01396
Plaintiff:
Dana Elroy Smith and William Carl Matthews, Jr.
Defendant:
John D. Decker, Casey McClaine, Jessica Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Couch v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv05659
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lynn Couch, Sr
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Stella Spracklin, Amber Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Decker v. McNamara et al
as 0:2020cv01536
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Decker
Defendant:
Keith McNamara, Jeffrey Marshall and Hennepin County, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Decker v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv04139
Plaintiff:
John D. Decker
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gibson et al v. Central Montana Community Health Center et al
as 4:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Barbara A Gibson , John Travis Morgan Gibson and Dixie Lee Gibson
Defendant:
Central Montana Community Health Center , Kimberlee D. Decker and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Larry Cochran v. D. Decker, et al
as 14-3584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY COCHRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. DECKER, C. BLILA and C. KLINK
COCHRAN v. DECKER et al
as 2:2013cv00250
Defendant:
C. BLILA, D. DECKER and C. KLINK
Plaintiff:
LARRY COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Decker v. Robert
as 13-3084
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES D. DECKER
Respondent - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
