Cases 21 - 30 of 608
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SOC LLC et al v. Conner II et al
as 1:2022cv01280
Plaintiff:
SOC LLC and Day & Zimmermann Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Billy Max Conner II and David Ray Johnson
The Celebrity Source LLC v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv09440
Plaintiff:
THE CELEBRITY SOURCE LLC
Defendant:
STRATEGIC VISION LLC, David E Johnson, Strategic Vision LLC a Georgia Limited Liability Company doing business as Strategic Vision PR Group and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19554
Plaintiff:
DAVID ARTHUR JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv19309
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHARLES JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES INSURANCE COMPANY INC v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES INSURANCE COMPANY INC
Defendant:
DAVID T JOHNSON, URVASHI FOSTER, BILLY JOE FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
USA v. Johnson
as 22-30567
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
David Ray Johnson
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00650
Plaintiff:
David R Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Johnson v. Bowen
as 4:2022cv00166
Petitioner:
David R. Johnson
Respondent:
Tommy Bowen
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
