Cases 21 - 30 of 1,178
Cabalan v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cabalan
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Terry, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 24-6046
Plaintiff:
SINCERE TERRY, MIA HOGSETT, TYREKE BAKER and others
Defendant:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Attorney General and VICKI ZEMP BEHENNA, in her official capacity as the Oklahoma County District Attorney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Yukich et al v. Gentner Drummond et al
as 6:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Philip Yukich, III, Janel Renee Stewart and Janel Renee Stewart-Yukich
Defendant:
Attorney General of Oklahoma, Kenny Rogers, Robert Fagnant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Walter DrummondIn re: Walter Drummond
as 24-10699
Petitioner:
In re: WALTER DRUMMOND
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Welch v. Wilson et al
as 2:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D. Welch
Defendant:
Dewayne Wilson and D. Drummond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drummond v. Respiratory Sleep Solutions dba Stratus Neuro
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Drummond
Defendant:
Respiratory Sleep Solutions dba Stratus Neuro and Respiratory Sleep Solutions doing business as Stratus Neuro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
