Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Khalilzadeh v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv01504
Plaintiff:
Yagboh Khalilzadeh
Defendant:
Delise Smith and Daryl Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sharp, et al v. CGG Land (U.S.)
as 15-5113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. DANE SHARP, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, MARIANO ESPINOZA, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CGG LAND (U.S.) INC.
Sharp, et al v. CGG Land (U.S.)
as 15-5113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. DANE SHARP, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, MARIANO ESPINOZA, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CGG LAND (U.S.) INC.
SMITH et al v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as NJ/3:15-cv-03988
Plaintiff:
RUTHANN SMITH and DARYL SMITH
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES and others
SMITH et al v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv03988
Plaintiff:
RUTHANN SMITH and DARYL SMITH
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sams #169006 v. Quinn et al
as 1:2015cv00592
Plaintiff:
Daryl Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Quinn and Unknown Kludy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv12491
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv12083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv24290
Plaintiff:
Daryl Smith
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and The Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
