Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Hilde et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02117
Plaintiff:
Charles O. Hilde , Charles Hilde Farms , Steve Kermitt Rodke and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sconyers v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00620
Plaintiff:
David Jerome Sconyers
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sconyers v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as FLM/8:15-cv-00239
Plaintiff:
David Jerome Sconyers
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC , Janssen Ortho LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Sconyers v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
David Jerome Sconyers
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. Maiorana
as 1:2015cv00237
Petitioner:
David Jerome Crawford
Respondent:
Maiorana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gefke v. Commonwealth of Massachusett
as 14-8019
Petitioner:
DAVID JEROME GEFKE
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Gail Harper v. Ryan Lugbauer, et al
as 14-15759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GAIL HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
RYAN LUGBAUER, W. B. COYLE, DAVID JEROME KENNEDY, I and others
Crawford v. Ebbert
as 1:2014cv00529
Petitioner:
David Jerome Crawford
Respondent:
Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: David Parker
as 14-11063
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID JEROME PARKER
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Mitchell v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv14067
Petitioner:
David Jerome Mitchell
Respondent:
Florida Department of Corrections and The Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
