Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Roberts v. Genting New York LLC
as 21-833
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dalia Toppin, Natalio Herrera, Judith Allen and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Genting New York LLC, DBA Resorts World Casino New York City
Barnett v. Strother et al
as 6:2020cv01117
Defendant:
David Shaw, Judge Ralph T. Strother and John Wiergalla
Plaintiff:
Denny Howard Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins et al v. Bladen County Detention Center
as 5:2020ct03331
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilkins, Clifton Hyland, Jerrell Taylor and others
Defendant:
Bladen County Detention Center, Admin. David Shaw, Chief Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2020cv05788
Defendant:
Amanda Vitakainen, Gerald E Johnson, Shawn Waite and others
Plaintiff:
Armand R Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv43612
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCPEEK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv05943
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID SHAW MCPEEK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02246
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00313
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
David Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv14153
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkins v. Shaw et al
as 5:2020ct03031
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilkins
Defendant:
David Shaw, Phil Corbett, U.S. Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
