Cases 21 - 30 of 42
United States v. Jason Delbosque
as 15-1777
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jason Delbosque, also known as Jason Del Bosque
Edilio Del Bosque v. Starr County, Texas, et al
as 14-41414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDILIO DEL BOSQUE, VICTOR CANO and JOSE GERARDO GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
STARR COUNTY, TEXAS and RUBEN SAENZ, Starr County Commissioner, In his Official and Individual Capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02313
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02305
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Del Bosque v. Starr County, Texas et al
as 1:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
Edilio Del Bosque
Defendant:
Starr County, Texas and Ruben Saenz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Del Bosque et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-17692
Plaintiff:
San Juana Del Bosque and Matias Del Bosque
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Del Bosque et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv17692
Plaintiff:
San Juana Del Bosque and Matias Del Bosque
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00427
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Del Bosque et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00609
Plaintiff:
Mario Del Bosque and Maria Del Bosque
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Brandon Del Bosque
as 12-30421
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRANDON M. DEL BOSQUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
