Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00065
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv03326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheila Dennis Richardson v. Social Security Admin Office
as 2:2010cv05605
Plaintiff:
Sheila Dennis Richardson
Defendant:
Social Security Admin Office
Dennis Richardson v. USA
as 10-12063
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS RICHARDSON
Respondent - Appellee:
USA
Chapman v. New York State Division for Yo
as 10-967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bruce Chapman
Defendant:
New York State Division for Youth, New York State Department of Social Services, John Johnson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Office of Children and Family Services of the State of New York, Cornell University, New York State College of Human Ecology at Cornell University and others
Richardson v. USA
as 1:2010cv90071
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dennis Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Richardson v. Raemisch et al
as 3:2009cv00552
Plaintiff:
Dennis Richardson
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Jodine Deppish and Elliott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allison et al v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
as 2:2008cv01798
Plaintiff:
Doris Allison, Doris Allison, Doris Allison and others
Defendant:
Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-56838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hayward v. Forcht Wade Correctional Center et al
as 5:2008cv01019
Plaintiff:
Dannie Ray Hayward, Sr
Defendant:
Forcht Wade Correctional Center, Colt Parmer, Dennis Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
