Cases 21 - 30 of 260
USA v. Dennis Line
as 22-13904
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DENNIS LEE LINE
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03921
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Richardson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis Walls v. Superintendent Smithfield SCI, et al
as 22-3085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS LEE WALLS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SMITHFIELD SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Patterson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00470
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Patterson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00180
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Patterson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Uptain v. Penzone et al
as 2:2022cv01751
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Uptain
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Board of Directors and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 0:2022cv03470
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
In Re: Dennis Walls
as 22-2773
Petitioner:
DENNIS LEE WALLS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CHAD WAKEFIELD and others
Bigham v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq01898
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Bigham
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John Castleman, Sr., et al v. Dennis BurmanIn re: John Castleman, Sr., et al v. Dennis Burman
as 22-35604
Debtor:
In the Matter of: JOHN FELIX CASTLEMAN, Sr. and KIMBERLY KAY CASTLEMAN
Appellant:
JOHN FELIX CASTLEMAN, Sr.
Appellee:
DENNIS LEE BURMAN, Chapter 7 Trustee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
