Cases 21 - 30 of 9,568
Watson v. Evans Memorial Hospital et al
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Rodrekus Watson
Defendant:
Evans Memorial Hospital, Brian Adams, Cpt. McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vladimir Brik v. C. McConnell, et al
as 24-3481
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR VLADIMIROVICH BRIK
Defendant:
NURSE C. MCCONNELL, DOCTOR JOHN DUNLOP and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JAMES NESSLE
Vasser v. Anderson County Detention Center Doctor et al
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Charles Vasser
Defendant:
Anderson County Detention Center Doctor, Anderson County, TN, Anderson County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales, Antonio v. Rolon, Doctor
as 3:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bernard Gonzales
Defendant:
Doctor Rolon
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy Sutton, III v. Scott Wriggelsworth, et al
as 24-1483
Plaintiff:
ROY EUGENE SUTTON, III
Defendant:
SCOTT WRIGGELSWORTH, Sheriff, in official and personal capacity, JOHN DOE, Health Care Worker, in official and personal capacity and GLEN CIPULLO, Medical Doctor/Provider, in official and personal capacity
Joel Lozada v. Eric Chang
as 24-1489
Plaintiff:
JOEL LOZADA
Defendant:
ERIC CHANG, Doctor, personal, individual, and official capacity
Anderson Jr. v. Secretary of Veteran Affairs et al
as 0:2024cv60955
Plaintiff:
Norris Anderson Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary of Veteran Affairs and Unknown Doctors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Watson v. Adams et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Defendant:
Ms. Rylee, Brian Adams, McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrekus Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belford v. Anonymous Doctor et al
as 3:2024cv00456
Other:
Edward Belford
Defendant:
Anonymous Doctor, Anonymous Nurse and Anonymous Medical Organization
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
