Cases 21 - 30 of 1,065
Carroll v. Trump
as 24-644
Not Yet Classified:
E. JEAN CARROLL and DONALD TRUMP, JR., in his personal capacity
Kersey v. Trump
as 1:2024cv10556
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bailey v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bailey
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Donald Trump, Ms. FNU Harmon/Washburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Greene et al
as 1:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Wall
Defendant:
Stuart Greene, Kathleen Wall, Barron S. Wall, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
JENKINS v. TRUMP
as 1:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Hines v. Trump et al
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Mary and others
Hines v. Given et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Earl Given, Donald Trump, DM Has (YAS) and others
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-241
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Matthew Miller v. Dan Wilcot, et al
as 23-3623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant / Appellee:
Dan Wilcot, William K. Busch, Lynn Miller and others
Chosen One Ja'mima'ni v. Bush et al
as 1:2024cv10108
Defendant:
Don Muhamad, George Bush, Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Chosen One Ja'mima'ni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
