Cases 21 - 30 of 177
ARNOLD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv58144
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN E ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Arnold
as 3:2019cv01829
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Williams
Defendant:
Robert E. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton et al v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 6:2019cv01201
Plaintiff:
Lydia H. Crayton, Andrae Crayton and Lydia Crayton
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, Kim Doyel, Derek Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00343
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Plaintiff:
Susan E. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alejandro Prado v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 19-15985
Defendant:
HAMMOND, Appeals Examiner, J. JIMENEZ, Lieutenant, ALLEAN, Appeals Examiner and others
Defendant / Appellee:
D. BLACKWELL, Lieutenant, E. ARNOLD, Deputy Warden, GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO PRADO
Lewis Arnold v. USA
as 19-3538
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEWIS E. ARNOLD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00789
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Brown v. Arnold et al
as 2:2019cv00697
Plaintiff:
William Odessa Brown, II
Defendant:
C. Cagnina and E. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luis v. Zang et al
as 1:2012cv00629
Defendant:
Awareness Technologies, Inc., Mike Osborne, Peter Fuhrman and others
Petitioner:
Hill Ward Henderson, Scott J Stitt, James E Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Luis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
(PC) Gleason v. Voong et al
as 2:2019cv00621
Defendant:
L. Myers, L. Williams, J. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
