Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAFNER v. MILLS et al
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
JANET T MILLS, AARON FREY, SHENNA BELLOWS and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hafner v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 1:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Governor of NM Michelle Lujan Grisham, Raul Torrez and Mag Toulose Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAFNER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, ASHLEY MOODY and RON DESANTIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hafner v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv01859
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Ellen Rosenblum, Tina Kotek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAFNER v. U.S. MARSHAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2023cv22940
Petitioner:
ERIC HAFNER
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hafner v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
State of Montana, Greg Gianforte and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hafner v. Menendez
as 2:2023cv22689
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
ROBERT MENENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HAFNER v. SENATOR ROBERT MENENDEZ
as 2:2023cv22557
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
SENATOR ROBERT MENENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hafner v. Menendez
as 1:2023cv09862
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Senator Robert Menendez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
