Cases
Cases 21 - 27 of 27
PARISH v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv86640
Plaintiff: ETHELENE PARISH
Defendant: U.S. RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Custis v. Roanoke Chowan Community College We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00049
Plaintiff: Ethelene G. Custis
Defendant: Roanoke Chowan Community College
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01602
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01341
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CHASE BANK, USA, N.A. v. PARKER et al
as 1:2008cv00750
Plaintiff: CHASE BANK, USA, N.A.
Defendant: ETHELENE K. PARKER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Real Property None
GILBERT et al v. A C AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62028
Plaintiff: THOMAS GILBERT, SR. and ETHELENE GILBERT
Defendant: A C AND S, INC., A C AND S, INC., A C AND S, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION, MANVILLE CORPORATION, MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1994cv00356
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?