Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Jumbo et al v. Alabama State University et al
as 2:2016cv00312
Plaintiff: Success Jumbo , Savior B. Samuel , Brian Bake and others
Defendant: Alabama State University and Federal Republic of Nigeria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
USA v. All Assets Held, et al
as 16-5025
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America, Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section, Criminal Division
Defendant - Appellee: All Assets Held in the Investment Portfolio of Blue Holding (1) Pte. Ltd., on Behalf of or Traceable to Ridley Group Limited, and/or The Ridley Trust at J.O. Hambro Investment Management Limited and A, All Assets Held in the Investment Portfolio Of Blue Holding (2) Pte. Ltd., on Behalf of or Traceable to Ridley Group Limited, and/or the Ridley Trust At J.O. Hambro Investment Management Limited and A, All Assets Held in the Investment Portfolio of Blue Holding (1) Pte. Ltd., on Behalf of or Traceable to Ridley Group Limited, and/or the Ridley Trust at James Hambro & Partners LLP and all Interest, B and others
Claimant - Appellant: Godson M. Nnaka
Movant - Appellant: Federal Republic of Nigeria
Enron Nigeria Power Holding v. Federal Republic of Nigeria We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-7121
Petitioner - Appellee: Enron Nigeria Power Holding, Ltd.
Respondent - Appellant: Federal Republic of Nigeria
CIVILETIS INTERNATIONAL v. INTERNATIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE FOR PEACE et al
as 2:2015cv01434
Plaintiff: CIVILETIS INTERNATIONAL
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE FOR PEACE , GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA , SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ahmed v. City of Hodgenville et al
as 1:2014cv04156
Plaintiff: Oluwashina Ahmed
Defendant: City of Hodgenville, Washington, D.C., Ford's Theatre, Washington, D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enron Nigeria Power Holding, L v. Federal Republic of Nigeria
as 14-7121
Petitioner - Appellee: Enron Nigeria Power Holding, Ltd.
Respondent - Appellant: Federal Republic of Nigeria
Agha v. Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria
as 1:2014cv03670
Plaintiff: Mujtaba Agha
Defendant: Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALL ASSETS HELD IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 80020796, IN THE NAME OF DORAVILLE PROPERTIES CORPORATION, AT DEUTSCHE BANK INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED IN JERSEY, CHANNEL ISLANDS, AND ALL INTEREST, BENEFITS OR ASSETS TR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01832
Claimant: ZAINAB SHINKAFI BAGUDU, IBRAHIM BAGUDU, GODSON M. NNAKA and others
Defendant: ALL ASSETS HELD IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 223406510PUSD, IN THE NAME OF STANDARD ALLIANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED AT BANQUE SBA, AND ALL INTEREST, BENEFITS, OR ASSETS TRACEABLE THERETO, STANDARD ALLIANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED, A BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CORPORATION, TOGETHER WITH ITS ASSETS AND ALL PROPERTY TRACEABLE THERTO, ALL ASSETS HELD IN THE INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO OF BLUE HOLDING (2) PTE. LTD., ON BEHALF OF OR TRACEABLE TO RIDLEY GROUP LIMITED, AND/OR THE RIDLEY TRUST AT J.O. HAMBRO INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED AND A and others
Interested Party: FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA and NNSKS & ASSOCIATES
Petitioner: FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA and EMMANUEL OGEBE
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Embassy of the Federal Republ v. Ephraim Emeka Ugwuonye, et al
as 13-7131
Plaintiff - Appellee: Embassy of the Federal Republic of Nigeria
Defendant - Appellant: Ephraim Emeka Ugwuonye
Defendant - Appellee: Bruce E. Fein, ECU Law Group and ECU Associates, P.C.
Embassy of the Federal Republ v. Ephraim Emeka Ugwuonye, et al
as 13-7120
Plaintiff - Appellee: Embassy of the Federal Republic of Nigeria
Defendant - Appellant: Ephraim Emeka Ugwuonye
Defendant - Appellee: Bruce E. Fein, ECU Law Group and ECU Associates, P.C.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?