Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Johnson v. Johnson
as 1:2015at00946
Plaintiff:
Edward J Johnson
Defendant:
Gerald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FLOYD v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2015cv01368
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and GERALD JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
BRITTENY FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Dart
as 1:2015cv04912
Plaintiff:
Gerald Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Gerald Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv06313
Plaintiff:
Adobe Systems Incorporated
Defendant:
Does, Gerald Johnson and Jerrilee Johnson
Colfin AL-GA 1, LLC v. Johnson
as 1:2014cv01666
Plaintiff:
ColFin Al-GA 1, LLC
Defendant:
Gerald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Handy v. Olympus New Mexico Incorporated et al
as 2:2013cv02534
Plaintiff:
Joy Handy
Defendant:
Olympus New Mexico Incorporated, Camelhead Enterprises Incorporated, I.A.B.C. Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JOHNSON et al v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2013cv05667
Plaintiff:
GERALD JOHNSON, DAVID YODER, JASON DUFF and others
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Riley et al
as 2:2013cv02156
Plaintiff:
Gerald Johnson
Defendant:
. Riley, . Ahramovich, . Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald Johnson v. Carlos Eggleston, et al
as 13-3446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLOS EGGLESTON, and Individually, CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN and JOHN DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Lodge of Antioch, The et al
as 1:2012cv09888
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Cyanide Publishing , Shirley Eikhard USA Music and others
Defendant:
Lodge of Antioch, The, Gerald Johnson and James Donohue
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
