Cases 21 - 30 of 94
Gregory Davis v. USA
as 19-12769
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY LEWIS DAVIS
Bradley v. Underwriters at Bankers Insurance Company Under policy No. 527083660 et al
as 1:2019cv00275
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation Correction, Underwriters at Bankers Insurance Company Under policy No. 527083660 and Underwriters at Allegheny Casualty Under Policy No. AS2250k-3433
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Bradley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00237
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Earnest v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv02213
Defendant:
Gus Kostas, Arizona, State of, Clint Hiener and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Earnest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Gregory Davis
as 19-10514
Undetermined:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: GREGORY LEWIS DAVIS
Reasoner v. Kelley et al
as 1:2018cv01121
Defendant:
Greer Bunce, Sonny Melendez, Kim Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Reasoner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal - ERISA
Earnest #56363 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv04226
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Phoenix Police Department, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Earnest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest v. Jorin et al
as 4:2018cv00476
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Earnest
Defendant:
Daniela Romo, Unknown Reyes and Unknown Jorin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belvin v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv02637
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Belvin, III
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Earnest v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv01079
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Earnest
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Corizon, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
