Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Pierson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2013cv01509
Plaintiff:
Janice Pierson , Janet Plasse , Karen Coleman and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Pierson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as MOE/4:13-cv-01509
Plaintiff:
Janice Pierson , Janet Plasse , Karen Coleman and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
George Strong v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 11-55406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE BERRY STRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, Director, in her individual capacity, MATTHEW MARTEL, Associate Warden, in his individual capacity, JOANN GORDON, Warden, in her individual capacity and others
Merry-Berry et al v. Stryker Corporation
as 1:2009cv11826
Plaintiff:
Rebecca R Merry-Berry and George Berry
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Strong v. Beregovskaya
as 1:2009cv00821
Plaintiff:
George Berry Strong
Defendant:
O. Beregovskaya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong v. Beregovskaya
as 1:2009at00343
Plaintiff:
George Berry Strong
Defendant:
O. Beregovskaya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strong v. Elliot
as 1:2009cv00583
Defendant:
Kenneth Elliott
Plaintiff:
George Berry Strong
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Strong v. Elliot
as 1:2009at00239
Plaintiff:
George Berry Strong
Defendant:
K Elliot
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Berry v. The Smart Place, Adult and Children Services, Inc.
as 1:2008cv02019
Plaintiff:
George Berry
Defendant:
The Smart Place, Adult and Children Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Strong v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
George Berry Strong
Defendant:
Susan Hubbard and Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
