Cases
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Potter v. Aspen Surgical Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00237
Plaintiff: Jeremy Potter
Defendant: Aspen Surgical Products, Inc., Hill-Rom Company, Inc., Hill-Rom, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Universal Hospital Services, Inc. v. Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00032
Defendant: Hill-Rom Company, Inc., Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Hill-Rom Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Universal Hospital Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01848
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zotta v. Hill-Rom, Inc. et al Featured Case
as 1:2011cv05038
Defendant: Hill-Rom Company, Inc., Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., Hill-Rom Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Margaret Zotta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martinez et al v. Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02103
Defendant: Hill-Rom Company, Inc. and Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff: Nelson Martinez and Yadira Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Werth et al v. Hill-Rom Company, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2010cv02235
Plaintiff: Justin Werth , Melissa Werth and Allina Health System
Defendant: Hill-Rom Company, Inc., Hill-Rom Manufacturing, Inc. and Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sadler v. Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00399
Plaintiff: Lavon Sadler and Lavon Sadler
Defendant: Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., Liko Norh America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Type: Torts - Injury › Both
AT&T Corp. v. Hillenbrand Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv08233
Plaintiff: AT&T Corp.
Defendant: Hillenbrand Industries, Inc. and Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract › None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?