Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Lee v. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv00304
Plaintiff:
Arthur I. Lee
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barry v. Douglas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2017cv01944
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff's Office, Tony G. Spurlock, Tony (I) G. Spurlock and others
Plaintiff:
Emily Suzanne Barry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
exocad GmbH v. ProTech Dental Studio, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00920
Plaintiff:
exocad GmbH
Defendant:
ProTech Dental Studio, Inc., IL Jang, Sang I. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Denton v. Pastor et al
as 3:2017cv05075
Plaintiff:
Michael Denton
Defendant:
Paul Pastor, Marvin Spencer, Patti Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hentges v. Walter
as 1:2016cv01891
Plaintiff:
John M. Hentges
Defendant:
Carol A. Walter, John C. Hugger, Chris Voisinet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hentges v. Walter et al
as 1:2016cv01480
Plaintiff:
John M. Hentges
Defendant:
Carol A. Walter, Jamin M. Alabiso, Jamin (I) M. Alabiso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Janssen Research & Developement LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04251
Plaintiff:
Richard I. Lee
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Ortho, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holden v. KOAA TV Channel 5 & 30 et al
as 1:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Levi Holden
Defendant:
KOAA TV Channel 5 & 30, Cordillera Communications, Inc., Evening Post Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2252
Type:
Other Statutes
Dowling v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv02033
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Dowling and Jamie (I) Lee Dowling
Defendant:
General Motors L.L.C. and Key Safety Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
