Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Edward Hopkins v. Commissioner Social Security
as 19-2437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD J. HOPKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Windom v. Hatch et al
as 3:2018cv07660
Defendant:
Charles E Schumer, Mitch McConnell, Orrin G. Hatch and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron O Windom and Cameron O. Windom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hopkins et al
as 1:2018cv00652
Plaintiff:
Michele Edmark, Leonard J. Hopkins and Deborah Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
HOPKINS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2017cv13430
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. HOPKINS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
COLTRANE v. WALDIS et al
as 3:2017cv10062
Plaintiff:
LARRY A. COLTRANE
Defendant:
STEPHEN G. WALDIS, WILLIAM J. CADOGAN, THOMAS J. HOPKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
LEBOEUF v. WALDIS et al
as 3:2017cv09766
Plaintiff:
LISA LEBOEUF
Defendant:
STEPHEN G. WALDIS , WILLIAM J. CADOGAN , THOMAS J. HOPKINS and others
Movant:
LARRY A. COLTRANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAUGHLIN v. WALDIS et al
as 3:2017cv09039
Plaintiff:
KIRK LAUGHLIN
Defendant:
STEPHEN G. WALDIS, WILLIAM J. CADOGAN, THOMAS J. HOPKINS and others
Movant:
LARRY A. COLTRANE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
THIEFFRY v. WALDIS et al
as 3:2017cv07173
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA THIEFFRY
Defendant:
STEPHEN G. WALDIS, WILLIAM J. CADOGAN, THOMAS J. HOPKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
United States of America v. Wischnak et al
as 3:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Lee Wischnak, Daylene Ann Hopkins, Wade J. Hopkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hopkins v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv01316
Plaintiff:
Micah J Hopkins
Defendant:
Guy D Pierce, Andrew Tilden, Diane Pouk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
