Cases 21 - 30 of 319,291
Dancy v. JB Insurance Company, Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Gary Dancy
Defendant:
J B Insurance Co Ltd, Jess Transport Services L L C, Jorge A Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chesal v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv61087
Plaintiff:
Tina Chesal
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kennedy v. Rochester & Southern Railroad
as 5:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Kennedy, Jr.
Defendant:
Rochester & Southern Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Lopez et al v. Pacheco Lopez et al
as 3:2024cv01282
Plaintiff:
Luz J Lopez, Martinez Centeno Succession of Carmen Maria, Insurance Company Triples Propiedad and others
Defendant:
Paulette C Pacheco Lopez, Doe John, The Voice and Head & Neck Surgery Institute, PSC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Stourbridge Investments LLC v. Gelsinger et al
as 1:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Stourbridge Investments LLC
Defendant:
Pat Gelsinger, Frank D. Yeary, David Zinsner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Grabe v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv05211
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Grabe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv05225
Plaintiff:
John Williams
Defendant:
Maverick Carter, Gregory B. Maffei, Ping Fu and others
Rickel v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kavin Devon Rickel
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
