Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Saldana v. Secretary Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv20178
Defendant:
Classification Offic K. Rupp, M Herring, J. Hultz and others
Plaintiff:
Eliseo Gonzalez Saldana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez Ayala et al v. L.G. Drywall & Painting, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Gido H Zuniga and L.G. Drywall & Painting, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Mendez Garcia, Jose Alfredo Lopez Ayala and Jose Maximiliano Argueta
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Ortiz v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2020at00094
Defendant:
C. DOWNEY, County of San Joaquin, J. MENDEZ and others
Plaintiff:
Marco Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Riley v. Guerrero, et al.
as 1:2019cv01643
Defendant:
M. Garcia, J. Mendez, Guerrero and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serrano v. Mendez-Nunez et al
as 3:2019cv01955
Defendant:
Orlando Pagan-Ramirez and Carlos J. Mendez-Nunez
Plaintiff:
Omayra Serrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bitqyck Inc et al
as 3:2019cv02059
Defendant:
Samuel J Mendez, Bitqyck Inc and Bruce E Bise
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Marcela Mendez Maldonado v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60523
Petitioner:
MARCELA J. MENDEZ MALDONADO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Woods v. Dade C.I. "Security Staffs" et al
as 3:2018cv01382
Defendant:
R. Gonzalez, J. Mendez, V. Guerera and others
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jones v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv01537
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jones
Defendant:
J. Zamora, A. Shaw, J. Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jones v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02876
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jones
Defendant:
J. Zamora, A. Shaw, J. Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
