Cases 21 - 30 of 60
BARTOL v. BARROWCLOUGH et al
as 2:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BARTOL
Defendant:
ADAM BARROWCLOUGH , SHAWN RYAN , ANDREW O'NEILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALL v. MARICOPA COUNTY et al
as 1:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ANDREW BALL
Defendant:
MARICOPA COUNTY, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, JOHN DOES 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ARON v. AMMARY et al
as 5:2016cv05617
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ARON
Defendant:
JASON AMMARY , ANDREW HOLVECK , ALEXANDER BOEHM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MEDINA-PENA v. IANNETTA et al
as 5:2016cv05495
Plaintiff:
HECTOR MEDINA-PENA
Defendant:
JOSEPH M. IANNETTA , PATRICK BULL , JOHN/JANE DOES 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Burns v. Simmons et al
as 1:2016cv01246
Plaintiff:
Aaaron M. Burns
Defendant:
David Simmons, Jim O'Sullivan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. CHOMA et al
as 2:2016cv05764
Plaintiff:
SHERRY BELL
Defendant:
MYROSLAW CHOMA , ANISTAT , ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Newhoff et al v. R.J. Corman Railroad Group, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
Darlee Newhoff and Jacqueline Newhoff
Defendant:
R.J. Corman Railroad Group, LLC, James Samuelson, John Doe 1 - X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
HECKMAN v. AMMARY et al
as 5:2015cv04184
Plaintiff:
ELI HECKMAN
Defendant:
JASON A. AMMARY , JOHN/JANE DOES #1-X and CITY OF ALLENTOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUERRIDO-LOPEZ v. HOWELLS et al
as 5:2015cv01660
Plaintiff:
ANGEL GUERRIDO-LOPEZ
Defendant:
DAVID M. HOWELLS, III , JOSEPH M. IANNETTA , ROGER MACLEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
