Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Bowman v. Clarke
as 3:2017cv00161
Petitioner:
Jimmy Bowman
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fletcher v. Brock et al
as 6:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
William Fletcher
Defendant:
J Brock, T Rose and Jimmy Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Bowman v. J.T. Mann
as 16-7485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY BOWMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. T. MANN, individually and in official capacity, Detective, Prince George Police Department and DET. BRYANT, individually and in official capacity, Detective, Prince George Police Department
Bowman v. Mann et al
as 3:2015cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Bowman
Defendant:
J. T. Mann and Det. Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Tilley et al
as 6:2015cv00007
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Jimmy Bowman, Eddie M. Coleman, Corey Furr and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 2:2012cv00727
Plaintiff:
Dale Giles , Adam Abrahms , Mark J. Adamson and others
Defendant:
BP p.l.c., BP Exploration & Production Inc., BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Giles et al v. BP p.l.c., et al
as 4:2012cv00674
Plaintiff:
Dale Giles , Adam Abrahms , Mark J. Adamson and others
Defendant:
BP p.l.c.,, BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Willink v. Foxworth et al
as 6:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
David Willink
Defendant:
Todd Foxworth, Dwayne Dewberry, Travis Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v Dewberry, et al
as 6:2009cv00429
Plaintiff:
Dutarl L King
Defendant:
Dwayne E Dewberry, William D. Jock, Jennifer J Leon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Taylor v. Leslie Woods, et al
as 09-40234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD OWEN TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
LESLIE WOODS, KEVIN MOORE, MICHAEL W SIZEMORE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
